With Dorian, being gay was a part of his story.
#Balan wonderworld rule 34 mod#
For this side of the reactionary spectrum, it can be seen as a moral issue beyond simple fiction, an issue that flared up in a transformative way when a Dorian mod for Dragon Age: Inquisition went viral a mod that made his sexuality straight despite his entire storyline being a gripping tale of “coming out” when society wanted him dead or buried just for preferring men.
#Balan wonderworld rule 34 mods#
The reasoning against those particular mods is that same-sex relationship options are so few and far between in games, the number available is usually much smaller than heterosexual relationship counterparts and that messing with that type of representation is a form of erasure.
In the article about Judy, the argument about the ethical standards of tampering with storylines representing marginalized communities came up quite a bit. Reeves, is consent required or do we separate fiction from reality entirely despite how fiction shapes our lives daily? The deeper side of romance.
#Balan wonderworld rule 34 full#
With players taking content in their own hands by putting Keanu’s likeness on a sexbot, the age-old “is it or isn’t it” debate came back in full force: Silverhand vs. While Johnny Silverhand isn’t a real person, Reeves is, and Reeves – as an actor – only agreed to scenes that he explicitly signed off on. In the instance of the Keanu Reeves sex mod, the conversation surrounds consent. In fact, the “deeper connection to the real world” is something that I briefly touched on with another Cyberpunk 2077 mod we shared concerning an in-game modification that allows for Judy (a canonically lesbian character) to be romanced (fully voiced) by a male V. There are a few facets of this conversation beyond just protecting someone like Keanu Reeves. So what’s the “big deal”? The topic of modding is split between two major groups: the first group being “it’s just a game,” with the second group usually citing a deeper connection to the real world. When we shared the Cyberpunk 2077 mod ban, some comments brought up rule 34 – but it’s just one piece of the eternal debate on the ethics of modding sexual content. This is specifically true for things in entertainment that aren’t inherently sexual, but any attempt to thwart possible sexualization actually gives even more power to this created rule of the internet. Rule 34 isn’t an actual rule it’s just a term commonly used online to reference the fact that anything – absolutely anything – can be made into pornographic material via modding, fanart, etc. What is rule 34?įirst, let’s talk about the ever-present rule 34. But to understand the Great Debate Of Modding, we have to dive a bit deeper into the conversation surrounding this community. reality has always been a subject that has two clear and opposing stances. For as long as I’ve been covering mods in my career, the ethical debate of fiction vs. The conversation surrounding that previous coverage, and similar instances when a recognizable name is used in a game, prompted a desire to explore this topic further. The reason behind the ban was because the studio felt it was inappropriate to recreate explicit sexual encounters with a real person who did not give their permission (despite the character himself having numerous scenes throughout the game that were graphically sexual in nature). Earlier this week, we reported that CD Projekt Red banned a Cyberpunk 2077 mod that allowed players to retexturize in-game assets to virtually have sex with Keanu Reeves’ character, Johnny Silverhand.
0 kommentar(er)
